A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On September 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 23:25, the Defendant: (b) d (ma), who was a security guard of the apartment in question, was drunk in front of the Daegu Dong-gu C apartment, and was able to see that the victim D ( South and North age 71) was a Doar; and (b) flabed by a police box, and (c) flabeded the victim’s blab, and flabeded the victim’s blab.

As a result, the defendant puts the victim with salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A report on internal accidents (investigation into the other party of the shooting range);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate of D;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserted that the defendant's act constitutes excessive self-defense or excessive self-defense at night since the defendant's act constitutes self-defense or excessive self-defense at night.

살피건대, 설령 피해자가 피고인을 도둑으로 오인하여 피해자의 팔을 잡아당기거나 피고인의 얼굴을 움켜지고 때리려는 시늉을 한 사실이 있다고 하여도 위 증거들에 의하면, 피고인은 피해자를 넘어뜨린 후 피해자의 몸 위에 올라 타 한손으로 피해자의 목을 누르고 양 무릎으로 피해자의 허리를 누르고 있어 주변에 있던 주민이 와서 피고인을 피해자로부터 떼어낸 사실이 인정되는바, 위와 같은 피고인의 행위가 피해자의 부당한 공격에서 벗어나기 위하여 소극적 방어에 그쳤다

It does not seem to be an act necessary for or against defense, and it does not seem to be an act due to fear, bad faith, entertainment, or yellow dust at night.