The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. There is no significant change in circumstances that may consider the sentencing of the defendant after the judgment of the court below.

There is no significant amount of theft damage and there is an agreement between investigative agency and victims.

However, considering the records of this case and the reasons for sentencing of the judgment of the court below, even if the defendant asserted on the grounds of appeal, the court below’s punishment against the defendant who committed the thief in this case is unreasonable, even though he had been punished several times due to larceny, considering all the circumstances alleged on the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is not accepted.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.