logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.05.09 2017고단3899
공용물건손상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 30, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on March 30, 2018, and the said judgment was finalized on April 7, 201

1. Definite 00:55 on September 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) the police officer D, the police officer called up after receiving 112 report that a male male is towing a woman in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and (b) the victim E are able to observe; and (c) the victim E.

B. The report was also made by any son who was aware of his or her report.

Along with age, the victims were openly insultingd by publicly imprisoned, flusing, flusing, flusing, flusence.”

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, as seen above, was removed from the slope F belonging to the Seoul Mine Police Station that was called together with D and E, and the Defendant was faced with F’s chest on two occasions in a lush hand and pushed back F’s body twice.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

3. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time, time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, broken down the back door of the G patrol vehicle to the right edge.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Each complaint;

1. Photographs;

1. Previous convictions entered in facts constituting an offense: Application of inquiries, such as criminal history, and text of judgment;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (joint crimes of insult);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: Police officers in the performance of official duties.

arrow