logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.02.03 2016고단2487
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 10, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would normally pay the monthly payment to the victim on the part of the victim C’s D’s operation, which was located in the victim C, in the name of the 30 million Korean Won in E, thereby taking a priority in giving priority to the payment of the time limit amount.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property, and the monthly income was merely 1.2 million won and was difficult to pay 1.5 million won per month as a normal payment. Therefore, there was no intention or ability to pay the accounts subscribed in the name of the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and allowing the victim to be admitted to the fraternity in which E is located, was paid KRW 30 million from the victim on June 10, 201, and received KRW 60 million from the victim on July 15, 201, as indicated in the attached List of Crimes No. 201, the Defendant received KRW 60,000,000 from the victim on a total of four occasions under the name of the term of the extension money.

2. On July 1, 201, at the place indicated in paragraph 1, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would normally pay monthly installments by purchasing 10-month television on the face of a week by lending a credit card to the victim.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any particular property, and was required to pay KRW 300,000 per month with the payment of the fraternity subscribed to the name of the victim, and even if the monthly income is excessive to KRW 1.2 million, there was no intention or ability to pay the amount properly even if the Defendant borrowed the credit card of the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, purchased a television amounting to KRW 830,00 from F to 10 months from the victim’s Samsung Card in the name of the victim from the victim, and purchased a television amounting to KRW 832,00 in the name of the victim, and paid KRW 332,00 in the amount of 4-month installments, and did not pay KRW 498,000 in the remaining six-month installments, thereby allowing the victim

arrow