1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 142,579,245 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from October 1, 2015 to the date of full payment.

1. According to the reasoning of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 9, and Eul evidence Nos. 4 (including Serial number), witness C and D's testimony and arguments as to the cause of the claim, the defendant was supplied with the oil, etc. of a bus operated by the defendant from September 2008 to April 2013. The non-paid oil amount amounting to KRW 16,60,000 on April 1, 2013. The plaintiff decided to accept the defendant's fuel payment obligation against D from around 100 to 200,000 won, and the plaintiff continued to be supplied from around 15, 2015 to September 16, 2015 to the defendant's 16,60,000 won, and the plaintiff was supplied with the defendant's total oil amounting to KRW 1,71,08,000 on September 16, 2015.

The above recognition facts and the following circumstances, which can be recognized by the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 3, 7, 8, 10, and 11 (including branch numbers), are as follows. After supplying oil to the defendant's bus, the plaintiff prepared an oil charter containing the quantity of oil supplied to the defendant, and confirmed it by the relevant bus driver, offered a transaction list stating the quantity of oil supplied and the unit price for the oil, etc. on a ten-day basis, and issued an electronic tax invoice based thereon. The defendant seems to have continuously paid some amount of oil from May 1, 2013 to April 1, 2015, while he/she continued to pay some amount of oil to the defendant's representative director, he/she raises any objection to the transaction list or the unit price for oil on the electronic tax invoice received from the plaintiff.