The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion was well aware that the defendant's production and supply of the plaintiff to the plaintiff (the product name determined by the defendant was HINL AS-7550S, which is HINL-750S; hereinafter "the occupation of this case") did not contain any hazardous substance, or that it did not contain any saldehyde ingredients. However, the occupation of this case contains any saldehyde ingredients in excess of the internal regulation standards of Samsung Electronic System. Accordingly, the plaintiff could not use 40,000 meters of the first tape produced by the occupation of this case. Accordingly, the plaintiff suffered damage equivalent to approximately 241,200,000,000 won and damages for delay as part of the compensation for damages to the plaintiff.

B. The Defendant alleged that the Defendant supplied the Plaintiff with the starting point one year or more from January 2015, and there was no warning from the Plaintiff that the Defendant should not contain a certain quantity of the sodehyde ingredients or that such conditions were presented. The so-called sydehyde ingredients are not prohibited, and the Defendant did not know where the Plaintiff supplied the protehyde tape produced by using the protehy in this case. Thus, the Defendant did not know the fact that the protehyd ingredients were not contained in the protehyd ingredients or that the protehyd ingredients were not included in the protehyd ingredients, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is unreasonable.

2. The fact that a disposition document, such as a contract for the supply of the point-of-the-spot in this case, has not been prepared, and the fact that the Defendant supplied the Plaintiff with the point-of-the-spot in this case from January 2015 to March 2016 is not a dispute between the parties, and the court of this case.