logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.20 2016가단5092273
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 540,908,729; (b) KRW 1,000,000 to Plaintiff A; and (c) each of them, from February 7, 2015 to June 2018.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C are D-si (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 05:03 on February 7, 2015.

) A driving a vehicle to drive the airport into the airport of Gangseo-gu Office Public Health Center with a five-lane distance from the 5-lane boundary of Gangseo-gu Office, and, in violation of the signal from the mountain ginseng distance, Plaintiff A, who was on the right side of the road along the bicycle, was shocked (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

(2) In the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as climatic blood, brain damage, etc. due to the instant accident.

3) Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement on the Defendant’s vehicle (based on recognition)

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as a mutual aid business operator of defendant vehicle.

C. The defendant asserts that the defendant's liability should be limited in consideration of these circumstances, since the plaintiff Gap crosses a bicycle across the intersection, and the plaintiff Gap did not install reflectors or wear protective equipment such as safety caps.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff A attempted to cross the intersection, and the installation of safety devices such as reflectors, etc. seems to have no connection with the occurrence of the accident in this case.

However, the Plaintiff did not wear a safety cap to the Plaintiff, and such errors appears to have influenced the expansion of damages caused by the instant accident, considering the background of the accident, the injury part, and the aftermath disability, etc., the Defendant’s liability is limited to 90% in consideration of such circumstances.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the annexed table of calculation of damages shall be the same as each corresponding item, and the period for calculation convenience shall be monthly.

arrow