1. All part of the instant lawsuit is dismissed, and the Plaintiff’s conjunctive claim against the Defendants.

1. Basic facts

A. The instant company is a corporation that is engaged in ordinary passenger transport business, etc., and the Plaintiff is the trade union of the instant company, and D, E, and the Defendants, who were taxi engineers belonging to the instant company, were appointed by the chairperson and vice-chairperson of the Plaintiff trade union (hereinafter “instant primary election”), which was conducted on February 5, 2014 (hereinafter “instant primary election”). Each of the instant primary teams [D (candidate for the chairperson), E (candidate for the vice-chairperson), and B (candidate for the chairperson), and C (candidate for the vice-chairperson) (hereinafter “Defendant”) were sent to the Plaintiff and vice-chairperson.

B. On January 29, 2014, the election commission of the Plaintiff Trade Union organized to carry out the first election of this case (the election commission to carry out the first election of this case) did not draw a clear conclusion as to whether the scope of credit cards in the name of the principal under Article 27(5) of the Plaintiff Trade Union’s trade union’s trade union included in the scope of family cards, etc. However, the candidates attending the election commission at the election commission did not accept a clean, multiple labor unions are not permitted, and if a person wishing to establish multiple labor unions voluntarily resign from the company of this case (hereinafter “the resignation agreement of this case”).

(2) On February 1, 2014, the Election Commission publicly announced the meeting minutes of the election commission related to the discussion, as it did not draw a clear conclusion as to whether the scope of the credit card in one’s name includes the family card, etc.

C. On February 5, 2014, the election commission held the instant first election on February 5, 2014. The D team and the Defendants team obtained each 62 tickets and failed to determine the winner. On the same day from February 25, 2014 to February 26, 2014, the commission decided to hold the second election (hereinafter “instant second election”).

The second election of this case is held.