logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.12.16 2016고정101
업무방해교사
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000 and by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as a representative of E (hereinafter referred to as “E”), a person who entered into a contract with F of the Victim Educational Foundation F for the construction of a meal room in the G School around July 17, 2014, and Defendant B is the head of the working group in the construction site of E (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction site”).

E decided to complete the construction before June 30, 2015, but failed to comply therewith, the victim notified the termination of the contract to E, and on July 3, 2015, the Defendants had the Defendants withdraw from the construction site of this case.

1. In order to prevent the progress of construction by the victim on the grounds that the victim’s failure to directly conclude a construction contract with the subcontractor and to end the construction, disputes over the cost of construction with the victim and the said construction cannot be waived, Defendant A had Defendant B intruded Defendant B at the construction site of this case within G school and attached a notice to the effect that E is undergoing the exercise of lien, and had the victim interfered with the victim’s work by placing locks at the entrance of the instant construction site of this case.

Defendant

A around July 8, 2015, around 06:21, Defendant B instigated Defendant B to interfere with the victim’s school meal service work by force by allowing the entrance door at the instant construction site located at H school located at Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to attach advice to the effect that E is during the exercise of a lien, to be equipped with locks, and to prevent the employees sent by the victim from entering the entrance.

2. Defendant B

A. On July 8, 2015, Defendant B, according to Defendant A’s teachers, posted a notice of the fact that E is exercising a lien at the instant construction site located at H G school located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 8, 2015, and obstructed the victim’s school meal service work by placing the notice of the fact that E is exercising a lien at the entrance, locked the entrance, and preventing the victim from entering the entrance.

B. The defendant is above.

arrow