beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In 202, the Defendant resided with two children in the Republic of Korea and returned to the Republic of Korea after residing in the Republic of Korea by moving to New Zealand in 2002, and returned to the Republic of Korea with one child around 2008, and operated a restaurant (c) with an investment by borrowing money from another person at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, Seoul, but did not have any profit. However, around 2013, the Defendant was at least KRW 60,000 and was employed as a counselor at the Counseling Center (C) and received approximately KRW 1,50,000 per month after being employed as a counselor at the Counseling Center (C), but at the time of receiving approximately KRW 1,50,000 per month for school expenses and living expenses for one child who was attending the school in New Zealand, and loaned money from both the victim D and the victim (hereinafter referred to as the victim and the victim) under the name of his/her own living expenses and other necessary circumstances.
1. On August 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim D was at a place in the end of the end of August, 2014, with the victim D’s “her husband would have a global foreign school on the site of the Yongsan Military unit.”
The husband entered into a contract with G in the United Kingdom, which is a foreign school, and entered into a contract with 15 countries and students, such as the United States, Canada, and Australia. The expenses vary depending on the mother and child, thereby lending money. Finally, the husband entered into a false contract with H, I, and J convenience point, which is operating.”
However, at the time of fact, the husband of the defendant did not have a plan to establish a foreign school, and the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the victim.
Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received 300,000 won from the victim to the foreign exchange bank account under the Defendant’s name on August 29, 2014; and (c) from around that time to May 4, 2015.