logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.25 2016고단2381
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) filed a report on the drinking value at “C points” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, with the report of 112 that the drinking value is an issue; and (b) received a demand for payment of drinking value from the funeral E to the police box belonging to the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Police Station D commander of the Suwon-gu, Police Station, who called to the site at the scene, and want to take a bath for drinking.

The term "" and "batoned violence, such as batling bats of the above E by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer’s breath by breath, etc. In light of the contents and methods of the instant crime, the nature of the crime is inferior.

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized and contradictory to the defendant, and there is no other criminal record except the punishment imposed once as a fine by the crime of this case before this case, the circumstances leading to the crime, etc. shall be taken into account, and all the sentencing conditions of the defendant's age, sexual behavior, etc. as stated in the records and arguments shall be comprehensively taken into account, and the sentence shall be imposed as ordered.

arrow