1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

On August 3, 2015, 2015, a company that manufactures and sells lighting fixtures (hereinafter referred to as "LED") has been merged with the Plaintiff on August 3, 2015.

(B) The Defendant is a company that manufactures and sells electric power supply equipment (Swched Mode) for ESD lighting fixtures. The Defendant is a company that manufactures and sells a power supply equipment (Swched Mode).

LED electric power supply devices for household lighting fixtures are devices which convert electricity for domestic use into a straight line necessary for the point of a ED lighting fixture, and have 80 or more parts of the printing circuit such as “former Integrated Circuits” into a printed circuit board.

(2) The Plaintiff supplied the Plaintiff with a power supply device from May 201, 201, and the Plaintiff made use of the ED lighting device and sold it to the Accenture Commercial Corporation (hereinafter “Accenture”) by Japanese legal entity.

The Plaintiff, from August 2012 to February 2013, sold 16,80 LED lighting devices to EED’s Escure.

(이하 ‘이 사건 LED 조명기구 16,800개’라 한다). 이토츄는 이 사건 LED 조명기구 16,800개를 일본 전국에 산재한 C 서점 48개 매장에 판매설치하였는데, 그중 1,099개의 LED 조명기구에서 깜박거림(Flicker) 및 미점등 현상이 발생하였다

(이하 이와 같은 깜박거림 및 미점등 현상을 ‘이 사건 하자’라 한다). 원고의 이토추에 대한 손해배상 합의 이 사건 하자가 발생하자, 원고와 이토츄는 수차례 협의를 거쳐 2013. 10. 31. 최종적으로, 이 사건 LED 조명기구 16,800개의 전원공급장치 전부를 원고가 자체 제작한 전원공급장치로 교체하되, 원고는 무상으로 전원공급장치를 공급하고 또한 일본 통화 2,000만 엔(이하 ‘엔’이라 한다) 한도에서 교체 공사비용까지도 부담하는 것으로 합의하였다.

[Reasons for Recognition]