1. Defendant D shall remove to the Plaintiff three panty panty units installed above the ceiling of the real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2...

1. The following facts are acknowledged to the effect that there is no dispute or the entire pleadings, in addition to each macro- documentary evidence.

The registration of preservation of ownership was completed on October 7, 2013, in the order of building Nos. 1 and 1 and the above Nos. 1 and 1 (hereinafter referred to as “Gho Lake”);

[A] 1.2] G store and the store of this case are adjacent to each other in the direction of a large line as described in the above drawing.

[A] On October 22, 2013, the G store transferred ownership to J on October 22, 2013

[A] On November 5, 2013, K has completed its business registration with the trade name of “L convenience point M”, setting the location of a G store as the location of the G store.

[B] B] 1. Regarding G store, the interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior construction was conducted from November 23, 2013 to November 29, 2013.

[A] 5, B, 5] In this case, 3 air conditioners (hereinafter “instant air conditioners”) who are essential for the operation of convenience stores were installed above the tent of the instant store, not the G store.

Until then, the store of this case was registered for preservation of ownership in the first future, but it was not sold to others.

On August 21, 2015, the Plaintiff acquired each ownership in relation to the instant store on August 21, 2015, Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) on August 21, 2017.

[A] On October 21, 2018, the lease contract for the G-ho store was re-established in the name of the Defendant Company and K.

[B] B] Defendant D uses the name "management owner" of L convenience stores (M stores) in operation at G stores.

[A] 3] 2. Judgment

A. The Defendant Company is only the owner of Gho Lake shop, not the founder of the instant cooling panty.

It is not a direct possessor.

There is no disposition authority.

Therefore, there is no obligation of removal.

The plaintiff's claim to remove panty against the defendant company is not accepted.

The dismissal is dismissed.

B. This part of this part below Defendant D.

(b).