1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant’s resolution to dismiss the representative of each Dong on July 12, 2017 against the Plaintiff, and January 19, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 22, 2016, the Plaintiff, as the representative of the instant apartment building 111 Dong-gu, Ansan-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”) transferred into 111 Dong 2802, and on July 18, 2016, was elected as the chairperson of the Defendant.

B. The Plaintiff’s dismissal of the representative of the 111-dong apartment building 1) the election commission of the instant apartment building (hereinafter “instant election commission”).

(3) On May 17, 2017, a meeting of the Election Commission was held, and the Plaintiff decided to lose the Plaintiff’s qualification as the president of the Plaintiff and the representative of the instant apartment building 111 units on the ground that the Plaintiff does not actually reside in 111 Dong 2802, and the following was publicly announced. (2) The instant election commission decided to hold the special election for the representatives of the instant apartment building 111 units on June 1, 2017, when it decided to lose the Plaintiff’s qualification as the Plaintiff as 1) as 1) and decided to hold the instant special election for the instant apartment building 111 units on June 1, 2017. (3) The Plaintiff filed an application for the provisional disposition for the prohibition of holding an election for the election to be held at the Suwon District Court, the Defendant convened the instant provisional election to be held on behalf of the president of the Plaintiff on May 31, 2017, and announced it within the council of occupants’ representatives on July 315, 2017.

1. Although the Plaintiff’s “actual residence” of the representative of the instant apartment building 111 ought to be explained to the instant election management commission, the Defendant submitted explanatory materials, and the representative of each Dong submitted explanatory materials on the day of the meeting to submit them on the day of the meeting to examine the materials closely, and the Defendant did not promptly recover and confirm the Plaintiff’s “actual residence.”

2. Composition of the executives of the defendant collective housing management rules (Article 19)