logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2017.08.24 2015가합22608
물품대금
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuits, the part demanding KRW 267,243,393 shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person whose purpose is to manufacture automobile parts, etc., and the Defendant is a juristic person whose purpose is to manufacture and sell gold-type products.

B. During the period from December 1, 2010 to June 30, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a contract with the content that the Plaintiff manufactures gold surcharges to manufacture automobile parts and supplies them to the Defendant or accepts gold surcharges supplied by the Plaintiff.

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 and 7 (including each number)

2. Determination as to the cause of claim, etc.

A. The fact that the Defendant was bearing the Plaintiff the goods or the repair obligation as described in the following table may be acknowledged by taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and Eul evidence No. 22 (including each number), respectively.

Unless there are special circumstances, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total amount of 375,845,000 won and delay damages therefor.

1 December 1, 2010, 12. 0-M 300 IPH/ON 57, 178, 00 on July 3, 2012, A150 GAL GE L 63,900, 309 FR DH/R 200 on August 31, 201 30, 6, 600, 600, 00, 200, 30, 200, 30, 20, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 30, 30, 30, 430, 200

arrow