1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1.The following facts may be acknowledged, either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the purpose of the entire pleadings, on the statements and images of Gap evidence 1 to 11, Eul evidence 1 and 3:

The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with a new special company and A cargo truck (hereinafter “Plaintiff”). The Defendant is an insurer that has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B (hereinafter “Defendant”).

나. 피고차량은 2016. 10. 22. 14:15경 서울 동대문구 장안동 군자교 인근 편도 3차선 동부간선도로의 3차로를 진행하던 중 우측에 1차로의 진입로가 합류하는 지점 부근에서 앞서 가는 차량을 추월하기 위하여 위 3차로와 진입로 사이에 설치된 안전지대를 넘어 진입로로 차선을 변경하다가, 때마침 동부간선도로에 진입하기 위하여 위 진입로를 주행 중이던 원고차량의 운전석 쪽 앞바퀴 부분을 피고차량의 조수석 쪽 앞범퍼 부분으로 충격하였고, 그 충격으로 3차로 방향으로 튕겨져 나가 위 3차로를 진행하고 있던 C 차량(이하 ‘소외차량’이라 한다)을 피고차량의 좌측 측면 부분으로 다시 충격하는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)가 발생하였다.

C. The Defendant filed a petition with the Plaintiff for deliberation on the payment of KRW 6,284,00, out of KRW 15,710,000 paid by the Defendant on the premise that the Defendant’s liability ratio of the Plaintiff’s vehicle was 40%, and the Deliberative Committee on May 15, 2017, on the ground that “an accident that collisions with the Plaintiff’s vehicle that the Defendant’s vehicle was under direct control through the safety zone and caused damage, etc. to be considered” on May 15, 2017, to the effect that “the Defendant’s liability ratio of the applicant (the Defendant)” and “10% of the amount of the respondent’s liability ratio, 571,00 won for deliberation and resolution.”