logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.06.11 2014고단1053
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 1053"

1. Around November 3, 2007, the Defendant was willing to receive insurance money from an insurance company after intentionally paying a traffic accident with CS, etc.

On November 13, 2007, the Defendant intentionally received a traffic accident while driving CT Cost Sheet vehicle with CS, CU, CV, and CW in the vicinity of the Busan Bupyeong-gu Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon. On November 13, 2007, the Defendant claimed insurance money by pretending that the victim Samsung Fire Maritime Co., Ltd. actually suffered damage due to a traffic accident.

In collusion with the Defendant, the Defendant, from the victimized company, received 989,800 won as agreed money and treatment expenses around November 15, 2007, 34,260 won as agreed money and treatment expenses around November 15, 2007, 3V as agreed money and treatment expenses around November 15, 2007, 1,512,410 won as agreed money and treatment expenses around November 23, 2007, cU acquired 941,550 won as agreed money and treatment expenses, cW received 956,670 won as agreed money and treatment expenses around November 15, 2007, and CW acquired 5,334,690 won as total.

2. On April 20, 2008, the Defendant: (a) around 11:45 on April 20, 2008, at the one-way street in the high-speed of the members of Ansan-si, the Defendant: (b) was faced with the DF SM7 vehicles and vehicles of the DE driving while driving the CZM5 vehicles with DA (the same day on the same day), DB, DC, and DD; and (c) was hospitalized to claim insurance money from the victim IG damage insurance company at around that time, even though the degree of injury was not required to be hospitalized; (d) the Defendant was hospitalized to the hospital; and (e) was hospitalized to the hospital; and (e) was hospitalized to the victim IG damage insurance company at that time.

The Defendant, in collusion with DB, by deceiving the damaged company as such, received KRW 1,441,240 under the pretext of agreement and treatment expenses, KRW 819,590 under the pretext of vehicle repair expenses, and KRW 923,680 under the pretext of agreement and treatment expenses around April 23, 2008, and KRW 923,680 under the pretext of agreement and treatment expenses, and EF around April 21, 2008.

arrow