The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a party member of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, who was in the process of an assembly as a person in charge of the assembly in Jongno-gu C, and the victim E (V, 36 years old) is a person who was in the process of the assembly.

around 15:55 on October 28, 2017, the Defendant, at the entrance of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, called “B party’s signature movement related to FF release” at the entrance of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and “G press H is replaced by fraud.

“The victim made a speech,” and the victim was slick, and the victim was slick, and the victim tried to photograph the Defendant’s speech with a cell phone in order to prevent the assembly from being able to interfere with the passage of the assembly, and the Defendant committed assault at one time against the victim’s left hand by his/her hand.

2. The recognition of facts constituting an offense in a criminal trial ought to be based on strict evidence with probative value, which makes a judge not to have any reasonable doubt. As such, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof does not sufficiently reach the extent that it would lead to such conviction, even if there are suspicions of guilt, such as the defendant’s assertion or defense contradictory or uncomfortable dismissal, it should be determined in the interests of the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do1487, Apr. 28, 201). The evidence presented as follows to the facts charged in the instant case ought to be determined in the interests of the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do1487, Apr. 28, 201). The E’s testimony in investigative agency and this court, witness I’s I’s testimony, witness J and K’s testimony, and video CDs were found to exist, and, in light of the same, the Defendant consistently from investigative agency to this court

However, according to the video of the above video CDs, the Defendant, at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, has spawned their spawns, and even if the Defendant’s hand spawns back to the victim’s hand, the Defendant continued to spawn the spawn.