logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.02.22 2017나37311
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation as to this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: ① Part 9 through 12 out of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance: ① Part 2 was held in the name of the second floor among the three-story buildings located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F at the time of death (hereinafter "real estate in this case") and approximately KRW 14,794,000, bank deposits and insurance money were held in the name of the company; ② Part 202 of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G building No. 202 (hereinafter "G in this case") was held in title in the name of the plaintiff before the birth, and completed the registration of title transfer in the name of the plaintiff [the plaintiff's own dispute over the title trust of the above real estate, but the plaintiff's objection against the title trust of the above real estate is not accepted, ② Part 18 was put to the "new title trust registration of the plaintiff's inherited property in the name of the court of first instance" or "No. 147,".

2. Determination on new arguments

A. The purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the agreement on gift with respect to the instant G was cancelled due to the Defendant’s fault, and the said agreement constitutes an important part of the agreement on inherited property, including agreement on division of inherited property, bank deposits, and insurance money disposal agreement on the instant real estate. As such, the said agreement shall be borne by

arrow