beta
Text
1.(a)
Defendant A delivers to Defendant Korea Land & Housing Corporation the real estate listed in the attached list;
(b) the defendant.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On July 26, 2012, Defendant A entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation by setting the rental deposit amount of KRW 20,867,00, monthly rent of KRW 187,800, and the lease term of KRW 187,800 from August 1, 2012 to July 31, 2014, and around that time, Defendant A paid the lease deposit to the Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation.
B. On September 5, 2012, Defendant A transferred the claim for the return of the lease deposit under the instant lease agreement to the Bank of Gambling Savings Co., Ltd., and notified the Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation of the said assignment on the same day.
C. On August 29, 2014, the Culture and Housing Bank Co., Ltd. transferred the above lease deposit repayment claim to the Plaintiff, and notified the Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation of the assignment of the above lease deposit on the same day.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 6, Eul 1 through 5, purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since the lease contract of this case terminated on July 31, 2014, it has expired, the defendant A is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation at the request of the plaintiff subrogated to the defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation, and the defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation is obligated to pay to the plaintiff who acquired the claim to return the lease deposit of this case at the same time as the transfer of the real estate of this case from the 20,867,000 won to the plaintiff who acquired the claim to return the lease deposit of this case from the 20,867,000 won
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant A is reasonable, and the defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation's claim against the defendant is partially reasonable, so it is so decided as per Disposition.