logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.07.23 2014노1896
대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts1) Of the facts stated in the judgment of the court below, the defendant only borrowed money to E and H and received partial repayment of principal, but the defendant recognized that he had the interest of 914.9% and 191.1% in a way that he redeems it to E and H as stated in the indictment, including principal and interest, and there is an error of law affecting the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts. 2) Of the facts stated in the judgment of the court below, the defendant asserts that "No 2013 high-level 810 out of the facts stated in the judgment of the court below, the defendant did not have any influence on the victim K on August 1, 2012, 10, 2000, 1000 high-level 537 high-level 20,000 high-level and high-level 537 high-level, and 20,000 high-level 2, 10,000 Ga 1,000.

3. Of the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below, the Defendant requested the police officer K to investigate AE, etc., but K was a civil case, and K was not a criminal case, and even if he abused his official authority and abandons his duties as a police officer for the reason that he did not inform the Defendant to receive a written complaint or attempted to investigate a witness, etc., the Defendant abused his official authority.

arrow