logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.05.11 2015고단4685
공문서변조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is the representative director B of the company, who alters official documents.

around May 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed an application with the Seoul Central District Court for the disposal of infringed gold prices, such as service marks, etc. (2015Kahap 890); (b) filed a false assertion with D; (c) the Defendant’s sales in 2014 of the Defendant’s stock company B, which was issued in the name of the head of the Busan District Tax Office, for the purpose of using the “certification of standard financial statements” for the year 2014 for the 300 square meters; and (d) without authority using the computer-type program for the 36th anniversary of the standard financial statements verification standard financial statements; and (e) replaced the “amount of 489,042,692” in the column of “I.S. 3 with the “amount of 489,890,426,920”; and (d) changed the amount of 17.5 times the standard financial statements with the “amount of 165 times the statement” as “amount of 160.5 times the financial statements”; (360.65 times the statement”).

Therefore, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant changed one copy of the standard financial statements certification for the corporation B, which is a public document in the name of the head of the Busan District Tax Office.

2. On July 22, 2015, the Defendant, at the Seoul Central District Court’s civil petition office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, submitted a modified public document document certificate to a court employee who is aware of the alteration, as if the certificate of standard financial statements, which is an altered public document, was issued genuinely, and exercised it along with the written application for disposition.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow