logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원마산지원 2013.05.01 2012가단10204
건물명도등
Text

1. The Defendants ordered the Plaintiff to order the building indicated in the attached list.

2. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff on 9,600.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 9, 2007, the Plaintiff, the owner of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, entered into a lease contract with the Defendants for the lease deposit of KRW 10,000,000 per month, monthly rent of KRW 400,00 per month, and the lease period of KRW 2 years for lease. The Defendant C occupied the above real estate and resided until now.

B. From 2007 to August 8, 2012, the Defendants did not pay several monthly payments, and the Plaintiff notified the Defendants of termination on April 26, 2010, and the notice of termination was served on the Defendants around that time.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1 to 7 evidence (including paper numbers)

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Thus, the defendants shall issue an order to the plaintiff, as stated in the attached list, and jointly and severally seek from July 9, 2007 to August 8, 2012, amounting to 19,60,000 won [2,00,000 won (40,000 won that was not paid in 207 x 5 times) 2,80,000 won (40,000 won that was not paid in 200,000 won x 7) 4,00,000 won (40,000 won that was not paid in 200,000 won x 20,000 won (30,000 won that was not paid in 209 x 10,000 won) x 2,800 won that was not paid in 20,000 won (30,000 won that was not paid in 200,1008 x 204. x 008 won that were paid).

B. As to this, the Defendants asserted to the effect that the Plaintiff promised to sell the instant real estate to the Defendants or to take responsibility for the structures installed by the Defendants, etc., and thus, they cannot comply with the Plaintiff’s claim. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, the Defendants

3. If so, the plaintiff's conclusion is against the defendants.

arrow