logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.08.25 2014나2030641
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

Based on the facts, Defendant B’s relevant parties are the doctors operating the C dental clinic located in Gyeonggi-gun D (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”). The Central University of the Defendant Educational Foundation is a legal entity that operates the Central University Hospital located in Black-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); and the Plaintiff was subject to the Defendant Council member’s personnel treatment, personnel care, and organizational examination, etc. from Defendant B; and the Plaintiff was subject to the Defendant hospital’s personnel treatment, personnel care, and organizational examination.

On January 25, 2006, the Plaintiff’s past history was transferred to the Defendant Council member for the sake of loving No. 18 of the right top-down on January 25, 2006, and Defendant B executed the said love to the Plaintiff on the same day, and conducted the Plaintiff’s taking of the crypting and the crypting of the crypt. on February 4, 2006.

On August 25, 2007, Defendant B implemented the Schedule to the Plaintiff.

On May 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the right bank cancer at the Defendant Hospital, and on May 29, 2006, the Defendant Hospital was treated as a modified flexible control medicine.

On June 2007, the Plaintiff was confirmed to transfer to the right side of the Defendant hospital. From the medical staff of the Defendant hospital, the Plaintiff took effect of the cryp chemical cryption in three times on July 2007, October 2007, and around January 2008, on three occasions, respectively.

On March 16, 2009, the Plaintiff filed a motion to go to the Defendant Council at the Defendant Council’s address on the left-hand 36th day of the Plaintiff’s medical treatment, and Defendant B filed a motion to go to the Defendant Council on the same day on the left-hand 36,37 of the Plaintiff’s Daegu radiation shooting on the same day.

On April 16, 2009, Defendant B explained to the Plaintiff on Daegu District No. 36 on the left-hand side of the Republic of Korea the possibility of neutic treatment due to neutism, and conducted an increase in human rights for alate. On April 25, 2009, Defendant B conducted algorating on Daegu District No. 36 on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff.

On February 23, 2011, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Council, and the Defendant B obtained the impression for the Plaintiff to rainate in Daegu, No. 46, the right-hand music of the Plaintiff.

arrow