1. The Defendant: KRW 9,846,230 to Plaintiff A; KRW 7,664,80 to Plaintiff B; KRW 14,632,800 to Plaintiff C; and KRW 5,208 to Plaintiff D.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business Approval and Notice - Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (FF G G G GGGGGG in Busan Metropolitan City) - Public Notice H of Busan Metropolitan City on May 16, 2012, I of the same Public Notice, October 31, 2012, J of the same Public Notice, KK of November 6, 2013, and December 25, 2013;

B. The adjudication of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”): Land and obstacles owned by the plaintiffs in the rearrangement project zone, which are indicated in the attached Table “subject to expropriation” column.

- Compensation for losses: as shown in the attached Table “Adjudication Amount for Expropriation” column.

- Commencement date of expropriation: April 16, 2014

The Central Land Tribunal's ruling on an objection (hereinafter referred to as the "adjudication on an objection of this case") - Contents of the adjudication: It shall be as shown in the column of "amount of the objection" in the attached Table.

Results of request for appraisal with respect to the appraiser L of this Court (hereinafter referred to as "court appraisal") - Contents of appraisal: The amount of appraisal shall be as stated in the column of "amount of court appraisal" in the attached Table.

[Reasons for Recognition] A without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6 (including each number), the result of the commission of appraisal to appraiser L by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The comparative standard land selected by the plaintiffs' appraisal and assessment is located far from the land subject to the expropriation of this case, and the living zone is different, and it is not appropriate as a comparative standard land.

In addition, in light of each compensation unit price of the land incorporated into the zone for the Donnam Shipbuilding in 2009 and the N apartment city planning site in 2010, the selection of evaluation precedents was also erroneous.

Therefore, the plaintiffs seek the payment of the amount calculated by deducting the amount recognized by the court's appraisal value from the amount of the appraisal value, plus 100,000 won each.

B. According to the result of the court appraisal on whether the selection of comparative standard land was illegal and the result of each fact-finding on the appraiser and the shipping Daegu Office, the appraiser shall acquire land, etc. for public works and make compensation therefor.