logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.01.30 2019구합904
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition rejecting an administrative information disclosure request made against the Plaintiff on February 27, 2019 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff, B, and C purchased from D, E, and F (hereinafter “D et al.”) on March 7, 2017, the first floor I (hereinafter “instant shopping mall”) of the Busan Shipping Daegu G et al., and completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant shopping mall on April 18, 2017.

On February 21, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the disclosure of information on the price reported by the purchaser D and two other persons on the instant commercial building and the date of reporting the actual market price (hereinafter “instant information”).

On February 27, 2019, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the decision that the instant information constitutes information subject to non-disclosure pursuant to Article 9(1)3, 7, and 8 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”).

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). On April 9, 2019, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed an administrative appeal with the Busan Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission, but the said administrative appeal was dismissed on June 11, 2019.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including those with serial numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to the plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case is already owned by the plaintiff, and thus, the information of this case is disclosed to the public, thereby causing significant harm to the protection of other people's body and property, and other information of this case does not constitute information subject to non

Nevertheless, the disposition of this case which did not disclose the information of this case shall be revoked in an unlawful manner.

The Defendant’s instant information constitutes information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)3, 6, 7, and 8 of the Information Disclosure Act.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

Judgment

The Information Disclosure Act guarantees the people's right to know and guarantees the transparency of citizens' participation in state affairs and state administration.

arrow