Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. When the victims of a mistake assault the defendant, the defendant only committed an act of threatening the victims to remove the victims, and did not commit an injury by assaulting the victims, such as the victim's head part and the telegraph.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance on the assertion of mistake of facts: ① The victims, from the investigative agency to the court of lower court, i.e., “whether the Defendant will engage in a funeral service by remote food, or not funeral with the victim’s knowledge of the upper degree,” and, i.e., whether the victim D was “d. . . ???????? there was a mistake,” from the point of time, i.e., whether the Defendant was the victim D’s hair and shoulder, and, from the point of time, she got up to the victim D following the victim D. The victim D’s face and telegraph with the victim’s son’s son and son, and the victim F. 1 and the victim’s 6th day after the victim’s son’s son’s son’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s mar and the victim’s 5th day after the victim’s son’s m.

A woman who seems to be a male's wife has left to stop his or her male, and he or she seems to be a restaurant operator.