Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 12, 2016, the Defendant suffered injury from the victim E (V, 24 years old) working in the 1st floor of the D department store D in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, and the victim E (V, 24 years old) working in the above guide E (V, 20 years old) in the past, and there was an escape between the Defendant and the Defendant.

Recognizing that it is believed, the victim's parts of each part of the victim's hand are removed in several times, and the head was removed and the head was removed several times.

As a result, the defendant brought the victim's injury to the left-hand hand, each hand hand, etc. which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant: (a) removed the victim’s grandchildren from around the above day to around 19:17 on the same day; (b) removed the victim’s hand, and changed his head’s body; and (c) prevented the victim from guiding the customer.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's department store guidance duty by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of witness E, F, G and H;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement of I;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Complaint;

1. The text of the text of the message;

1. A photograph of the upper part of the body;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion on each investigation report (in the investigation records, 67 pages, 34 pages), the Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant did not have any intention to commit any injury or interference with business, since he did not have the head of the victim’s hair at several times, did not spread the victim’s hand. The Defendant first assaulted the Defendant, and the Defendant did not have any intention to commit any injury or interference with business.

Therefore, according to the evidence of the court below, it is acknowledged that the defendant injured the victim as stated in the facts of crime 1 and 2 and interfered with the department store guidance service by force, and there is no evidence to support that the injured person first assaulted the defendant, or that the defendant's act constitutes a passive resistance as alleged by the defendant.