The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment against the defendant not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged was the relationship between the Defendant and the Joint Defendant F before separation from the E members’ service as a nursing assistant operated by D in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.

A. On January 10, 2015, the Defendant, in front of G restaurant located in Ulsan-gu, U.S., in order to inflict bodily injury (hereinafter “the instant injury”) on the face of an empty State, an empty State, which is an object dangerous to H, face with the G restaurant located in Ulsan-gu (hereinafter “instant injury”), was provided by E Council member D with a doctor, but the medical certificate issued as a result of the medical examination was expressed to the police by forging the treatment period in order to receive more agreements from the 1 week in the face and submit it to the police.

On January 2015, the Defendant asked the above E E’s private person F to forge a medical certificate of injury in the above D name at the I Hospital where the Defendant was hospitalized, and requested F and Kakao Stockholm to verify and correct the false medical certificate of injury through F and Kakao Stockholm message.

Accordingly, the defendant instigated FF to forge a certificate of injury in the name of D.

B. On January 29, 2015, the Defendant was investigated into a case that was damaged by the said H at the Defendant’s criminal police station in Ulsan Central Police Station and the J Team’s office, and as such, submitted a written diagnosis of injury that was forged by F according to the Defendant’s teacher to K as if he/she was genuinely aware of the fact.

2. Determination

A. Criminal facts in a criminal trial ought to be established based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads a judge to have a reasonable doubt. Thus, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof does not sufficiently reach the degree that such conviction would lead to a reasonable conviction, it should be determined in the interests of the defendant even if there is a suspicion of guilt (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do1487, Apr. 28, 201). (b) The evidence that the defendant instigated to forge the above medical certificate is admissible.