The defendant shall be innocent.

I. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, from February 2009 to October 24, 2010, worked as the victim D Apartment Self-Governing Council Chairperson in Mapopo City C, and was in charge of the collection of management expenses.

1. On April 10, 2009, the Defendant voluntarily withdrawn KRW 150,000 from the residents of the above apartment to the account in the name of the Defendant and brought it into the name of the president as the expenses for the business activities (management expenses) while keeping the management expenses in the business for the victim's autonomous council.

The defendant, including this, has the same effect.

7.2. 150,000 won, and the same year.

8.3.150,000 won, and the same year.

9. A total of KRW 1,350,000 on 15.15.1, and KRW 300,000 on 11.10,000 on 19.29, and KRW 450,000 on 29.10 on 2010 on 19.15.15.15.30,00 on 200 on 19.30 on 201.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled 1,350,000 won in total for management expenses over six times in total.

2. While the Defendant received management expenses from the above apartment in the account in the name of the Defendant and kept them for the victim's autonomous meeting of apartment, on September 28, 2009, the Defendant lent KRW 1,000,000 to E on the ground of personal friendship, respectively, to F on September 29.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled 2,00,000 won in total of management expenses over two times in total.

3. On January 4, 2010, the Defendant received 20,000,000 won from G, a company located in the above apartment commercial building, as an indemnity for the electricity transfer, and kept it for the victim’s apartment autonomy meeting.

On January 17, 2010, the Defendant received more than KRW 500,000 from the payment of KRW 1,000,000, and embezzled it, despite the fact that the Defendant was recognized as having contributed to detecting electric tools at the neighborhood meeting of the above apartment complex, and was determined to be paid compensation for KRW 500,000.

Ⅱ. Determination

1. The defendant withdrawn money as stated in the above facts charged against the judgment as to Article 1 of the facts charged. However, this is around April 2009.