1. Of the instant lawsuit, all of the lawsuits filed against the Defendants by the remaining designated parties, excluding the Plaintiff (designated parties).

1. Of the instant lawsuit, ex officio whether the lawsuit concerning the remaining designated parties other than the Plaintiff is lawful, the Plaintiff: (a) expressed himself/herself as the designated party to the instant lawsuit and received a recommendation to submit the list of designated parties; (b) submitted the list of designated parties as indicated in attached Form 1 in the amendment of January 24, 2019; (c) however, there is no evidence to support that the remaining designated parties other than the Plaintiff selected the Plaintiff as the designated party; and (d) there is no other evidence to support that the Plaintiff selected the Plaintiff as the designated party. Accordingly, the said lawsuit concerning the designated parties

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff, including the Defendants, should pay KRW 955,452,80 and delay damages to the Plaintiff, who was a director of AF, as well as KRW 955,452,80, as well as KRW 955,452,80, inasmuch as the Plaintiff, at the general meeting of AF (hereinafter “AF”), including the Defendants, was appointed and served as the president, vice-chairperson, director, auditor, secretary general, secretary general, and director of regional headquarters. The above appointment was made in a unlawful manner and caused damages to AF in total due to the tort as stated in attached Table 2, including the Defendants.

However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone, including the Defendants, was written on the grounds of the attached Form 2 claims.

It is insufficient to recognize whether the above acts constitute a tort, and that the amount of damage therefrom reaches KRW 955,452,800, or that the damage claim therefrom should accrue to the plaintiff, and there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the part concerning the remaining designated parties except the plaintiff is unlawful among the lawsuit in this case. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.