logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.07.08 2016구단5009
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 2010, the Plaintiff, a national of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as “Pakistan”) and stayed in the Republic of Korea upon obtaining permission for extension of the period of sojourn on September 1, 2010, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on June 18, 2015, prior to the expiration of the period of sojourn (on June 30, 2015).

B. On June 30, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision to deny refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that would be detrimental to a person’s status” as a refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff supported P.P.P.P.P.P. from 200 to 2007 by his father’s recommendation, and thereafter, supported the PML-N party, which is a unit of right, by his father’s recommendation.

The plaintiff was present at the meeting of the PTPP political party and was actively promoting the PTPP political party.

Accordingly, the PMF-N party members began to make intimidation again to the Plaintiff supporting the PTPP party.

On May 11, 2013, there was a total line of Pakistan, and around May 1, 2013, the Plaintiff’s East B was kidnapped by the PML-N party members to stop support for PML-N party members, and became a threat and group assault to support PML-N.

In this case, the plaintiff's family members did not participate in the election.

On November 2013, the Plaintiff returned to his own country and was married to a marriage. Four members of the PML-N affiliated with the GML-N, who met his her son, were in total on the bridge, and two other members were in a great degree while avoiding this.

In addition, the plaintiff around January 15, 2015 and PTI.

arrow