logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.04.13 2016가단36668
명도 및 철거와 원상 복구
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) from June 6, 2015, entry in the separate sheet is made.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 24, 2014, the Plaintiff leased real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant building”) to the Defendant, with a deposit of KRW 5 million, KRW 400,000 per month, and the period from July 5, 2014 to 24 months.

(hereinafter “Lease of this case”) b.

From June 6, 2015, the Defendant began to delay the rent, and on the ground of the delay of rent, the correction of the purport of the claim and supplement of the cause thereof, dated September 29, 2016, stating the declaration of intent to terminate the lease of this case on the ground of the delay of rent, reached the Defendant on October 4, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1, marked fact, purport of the whole pleading

2. Since the lease of this case terminated on October 4, 2016 due to the termination of the lease lease, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff. From June 6, 2015 to June 6, 2015, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff a rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent in proportion to KRW 400,000 per month from the date the delivery of the instant building is completed.

3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow