logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.10.17 2013고정197
존속상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. At around 06:00 on October 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses that he would incur the Defendant’s mother to repay the money that he borrowed from the Defendant’s mother E; and (b) disputing each other, the Defendant: (c) opened the Defendant’s head knife with the Defendant’s head knife with the knife’s knife with the knife’s knife with the knife’s knife with the Defendant’s knife with the knife’s knife’s knife with the knife’s knife’s knife, and divided

2. Determination

A. As evidence that the Defendant has divided E with his hand, the entry in the prosecutor’s protocol with respect to F, the entry in the investigation report (to listen to a shot G phone statement and the report on the attachment of recorded CD), and the written diagnosis with respect to E is written.

First, as to the probative value of the F’s written statement by the prosecutor, the witness F showed the appearance of E that the Defendant exceeded at the time when he was investigated by the prosecutor’s office, and even though the Defendant was not at the time of his investigation, he was exempted from both parts of E, and made a statement that he was faced with. In the court, when he testified as a witness, he appears to be in the situation where the Defendant and E are in conflict with each other in the process of being surrounded by the surrounding persons at the time stated in the facts charged, and the Defendant did not appear on the part of E, and he did not appear on the part of E, and he was said to go back to the house, and he was said to go back to the house, if he was speaked to his father, and it was not consistent with the statement, and it is difficult to believe that he made a statement in the prosecutor’s office as a witness and make it difficult to memory the contents of the statement in the prosecutor’s office as well as the statement in the court.

Next, with respect to the probative value of investigation reports (to listen to video phone call statements and recorded CD attachment reports), the above investigation reports are prosecutor's office.

arrow