1. Of the part against Defendant D and E in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following additional payment orders are applicable.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the Plaintiff Party A is the father of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant D and E are the parents of the Co-Defendant C of the first instance trial (O.S. and 13 years old at the time of tort).

Defendant Gyeong-do is a local government that manages and supervises F middle schools located in the Gyeong-do Armed Forces, and Defendant Gyeong-do's School Safety Mutual Aid Association is a corporation established with the purpose of compensating for students, etc. who have suffered damage to their lives and bodies due to school safety accidents in the Gyeong-do pursuant to the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents (hereinafter "School Safety Accidents Act").

B. In the instant tort, Plaintiff B moved around 10:35 on March 18, 201, when he was enrolled in the first half of the F Middle School, to the class of the second grade and second grade and second grade and the second grade and second grade and the second grade and third grade of the same school. At that point, Plaintiff B took the name of C and the mother of C, who was enrolled in the second grade and third grade and third grade of the same school. Plaintiff B took the name of C and her mother, and she took the part in the packing system before F elementary school before the towing of the F.C’s parents, and she took the word “us, us,” and she took the part of Plaintiff B’s right-hand part of the Plaintiff B, who was on a lue hand (hereinafter “instant tort”).

2) The Plaintiff B suffered injury, such as the instant tort, such as the heat, internal verification, external verification, external trauma back to the right side of the trauma, the primary self-explosion, the culpulatory blood, the culptive blood, the culpulpted net mortar, etc.

C. On August 12, 2011, the Juvenile Protection Case C was decided to take a protective disposition against the instant illegal act as flight in the Daegu District Court Family Branch case No. 2010 Pu1490 on August 12, 201.

[Ground of recognition] As to Defendant D and E: The court of first instance rendered a judgment on the above Defendants by public notice, but at the trial, a copy of the petition of appeal, the preparatory documents, and the writ of summons, etc. were served in a usual way.

However, the above Defendants did not appear on the date of trial, and written answers and others.