Defendant

A A Fines 1,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 1,000,000 won, Defendant C’s fine 1,00,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are married couple, Defendant C is the partner of Defendant B’s company, Defendant C is the victim’s debt relationship with Defendant B, and on August 10, 2017, Defendant B decided to talk with the other party to prepare a loan certificate in the name of the victim E, only before the G Ski-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seojin-gu, Seoul, Seoul around 17:10 on August 10, 2017, but the victim E refused to prepare a loan certificate, and diced with Defendant A, B, and C her drinking together with the other party’s Ha who entered G Ski.

1. Defendant A, among Schlage’s business owners and unspecified multiple customers on the same day, was the victim E, “I am sprinke sprinke, sprinke sprinke sprinke, sprinke sprinke,” and “I am sprinke,” and “I am sprinke” with the victim H who had performed drinking together;

The term "influence of death", "this brushes and low brushes," insulting each victim openly.

2. Defendant B, at the same place as set forth in paragraph 1, expressed to the victim E “I am, am, a fraudulent alteration, a am gue, a bad gue, a bad gue, and abrue,” and expressed to the victim H “I am the same fraud.”

Does it be converted to fraud

"Publicly insulting victims" and insulting each victim.

3. At the same place as paragraph 1, Defendant C expressed to the victim E the victim “assume, flabe, age, and series of food,” and “assume,” the victim H expressed a desire to “assume” and “assume, flabed,” and “assume, flabed the victim’s morale,” and insulting the victims each by openly insulting the victim E.

Summary of Evidence

The application of the law of the police statement protocol to H of the suspect interrogation protocol to the defendants' legal statement E

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1.Article 70(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.