A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of G Co., Ltd. who is a digital printing machine sales and management company.

H On February 191, 191, he/she was appointed as a Class-I civilian military employee of Grade-I printing job, and was in charge of printing-related work from I Printing to June 30, 2009. From July 1, 2009 to April 30, 2013, H is a Class-V civilian military employee in charge of identifying, installing, and managing various equipment, including digital legraph printing machines, introduced by J printing windows.

K On July 1, 200, K was appointed as a Class-V civilian military employee for the category of L printing job and was in charge of the printing-related work from L printing windows to June 30, 2009. From July 1, 2009 to J printing windows, from April 11, 201 to December 31, 2012, K starts work at the J printing windows, and is a Grade-4 civilian military employee who has overall control over all the affairs concerning the purchase, installation, operation, etc. of digital le-print printing machines as the head of the J printing printing team and the head of the project evaluation committee related to the introduction of the digital le-ray system from April 11, 201 to December 31, 201.

The Defendant came to know about the introduction of approximately KRW 2.3 billion digital le-print printing machines around the mid-to-mid of 201, the Defendant got aware of the fact that the digital le-print printing machine was intended to introduce approximately KRW 2.3 billion, with the intent to pay K money and valuables in relation to the selection of digital le-print printing machine delivery companies through H known to the general public.

1. On July 19, 201, the Defendant issued two million won in return for the offering of a bribe to H at a cafeteria located in the margul of the G-gymposium in the G-gymposium of the G-gymposium, upon requesting K to the effect that “The Defendant would inform K of the inside information of the J-gympos on the introduction of the digital symposium, and to the effect that G would be selected as a supplier.”

On November 15, 2011, the Defendant continued to select a supplier of the said digital lelephone on November 16, 201, after evaluating the project proposal for the selection of the supplier of the said digital lephone, the Defendant was selected as a supplier by G Co., Ltd. on November 16, 201. On April 4, 2012, the Defendant’s intention was to inspect the selection of the supplier at the cafeteria located in the mutual unclaimed restaurant located in the sporasium of the spora