The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car BM520.

On January 6, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car at around 17:55 on January 6, 2020, and led to the driving of the said car to the E Bank from the side of the D apartment to the one-lane road in front of the Yansan-gu C building in the Jeonju City.

At the time of night, the front door door of the night, and the front door door of the road was installed at the front door of the road, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service was a person to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right and the right of the road, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and got the victim F (the age of 15) to stand the crosswalk to the right side from the left side of the defendant's running direction by negligence, which led the defendant to go beyond the ground.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as an injury to the victim by an occupational negligence during approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by taking a survey report on the actual condition, on-site, and vehicle photographs, diagnostic reports, and visual images closures;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order are the first offender, and the victim and the public official have agreed smoothly with each other, and the summary order in this case seems to have been faithfully living. However, the summary order in this case appears to have determined the fine against the defendant by considering all favorable circumstances for the defendant (the first prosecutor's opinion on the fine when requesting the summary order was five million won).