The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized as favorable circumstances such as the time when the defendant committed the instant crime.

However, the Defendant appears to have not been in the state of being able to drive under the influence of alcohol at all at the time, the driving of the Defendant to other persons even after drunk, the investigative agency denied the fact of the crime and took a consistent attitude in the vindication. The Defendant had the record of having been punished several times as a crime of drunk driving and a crime of refusing to measure drinking, and the Defendant was also under the suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, it is reasonable to impose a strict punishment on the Defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, there is no special change of circumstances that make the original judgment and the punishment different from the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.