logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.14 2015가단11723
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

On May 23, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the sale of the apartment house on the ground of Incheon Cheongjin-gun, Incheon, which was owned by the Plaintiff for KRW 700 million, and the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the lease of KRW 302 and 401 of the above apartment house for KRW 300 million, respectively, and the above lease contract expires on September 14, 2015. Thus, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the lease deposit amount of KRW 60 million to the Plaintiff, but the lessor cannot be deemed to have been obligated to return the lease deposit to the lessee prior to the termination of the lease contract. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion cannot be accepted without examining other issues.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow