The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The court below's sentencing is reasonable in light of the following factors: (a) the defendant is led to a contingent crime committed in the state of exploitation, and the defendant's health and economic conditions are not good; and (b) the defendant's health and economic conditions are not good; and (c) the same records are two times or more; (b) in this case, the defendant was inflicted an injury on the employee of the hospital where the defendant was aware of the disturbance; (c) the quality of the crime cannot be deemed to be negligible; and (d) the risk of repeating the crime is likely to be very rough; (d) there is no change of circumstances to consider sentencing from the judgment of the court below to the trial after the sentence of the court below; and (e) there is no change of circumstances to consider the sentencing after the sentence of the case, such as the defendant's failure to receive the victim's letter, etc.; and (e) other various circumstances, including the motive and background of the crime in this case, the age, character

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.