1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where the third or lower portion of the judgment of the first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part (2) written by the Defendant asserts to the effect that the Plaintiff transferred the ownership of the instant real estate to the Defendant on June 27, 2012. However, the evidence No. 7 (a copy of the apartment sale contract’s ownership transfer/acquisition contract) consistent with the above argument cannot be used as evidence for the reasons as set forth below (3) and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the Defendant’s assertion. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

(3) If, barring any special circumstance, the authenticity of the seal imprinted on a private document is presumed to be established, barring any special circumstance, barring any special circumstance, if the seal imprinted with the seal imprinted by the seal imprinted on the private document, the authenticity of the document is presumed to be established pursuant to Article 358 of the Civil Procedure Act. On the other hand, if the authenticity of the seal imprinted is presumed to be established, i.e., the presumption that the act of signing and sealing is attributable to the intent of the holder of the title deed. As such, the presumption of the authenticity of the seal imprinted is broken if the person disputing the authenticity of the seal imprinted by the court proves that the act of

In addition, considering the fact that the authenticity of a disposal document is acknowledged, unless there is any clear and acceptable reflective evidence that the content of the document is denied, the existence and content of the expression of intent according to the content of the document should be recognized, it shall be careful in estimating the authenticity of the disposal document by the seal of the person in charge of the preparation, and in particular, it is revealed that the holder of the disposal document was delegated by the person in charge of his/her duties or relationship of relatives.