beta
Text
1. Defendant Republic of Korea shall be the Plaintiff:
(a)as to paragraphs 2, 3, and 5 of the land listed in the Schedule;
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. In the process of dividing the instant land and transferring the registration thereof (1) (hereinafter “instant land”), the Geju-gun 892 square meters prior to the Gyeonggi-gun, the land indicated in the separate sheet of land division (hereinafter “instant land”) is the 578 square meters prior to D, E, the 168 square meters prior to F, and the 146 square meters prior to F (hereinafter “the land prior to the instant subdivision”), as shown in the separate sheet of land division, the land prior to the instant subdivision was subdivided into five parcels as in the instant land, and the land category was changed.
On the other hand, on March 1, 1996, Pakistan was brought on the H Dong on July 25, 201.
(2) As to the land before the instant partition, short-term 4294 (1961)
6. 9. The registration of ownership preservation was completed under the name of the Defendant, but thereafter, the registration of ownership preservation was completed on June 7, 1961 by the Defendant’s Republic of Korea (hereinafter “Defendant”) as to each of the instant lands, among the instant lands divided from the land prior to the instant partition, and the registration was completed on June 7, 1961. As to the instant land, the registration of ownership preservation under the Defendant’s name was re-issued on May 31, 1990 as to the Goyang-gu District District Court and the Goyang-gu Branch Office of High Court and the 15054 on May 31, 1990.
In light of the fact that the Defendant stated on June 9, 1961 that the registration of ownership transfer was completed on June 7, 1961 as to the land of this case among the land of this case, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on June 1, 1961, and that the date of the registration of ownership transfer and the date of registration of ownership transfer are similar, the above registration of ownership transfer concerning the land of this case of this case of this case of 1, 3, and 4 are deemed to have been erroneously changed by mistake, and there is no evidence to presume that the registration of ownership transfer was completed on May 31, 1990 among the land of this case of this case of this case of the defendant as to May 31, 1990.
(3) The Defendant’s land of this case is Paragraphs 1 and 4 of this case.