logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.08.21 2015고단1551
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 16, 2015, the Defendant heard that the victim C was verbally stolen on the first floor of the department store D, which is managed by the victim C in Goyang-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu-gu-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si, and thought that he was suspected of being aware of himself, the Defendant demanded the victim to talk with the victim about 10 minutes of “I will see why I would see she she she she she she she she she she she she she she she would she she she she she she she she she, and returned to about 10 minutes of the first floor store she purchased. The Defendant interfered with the victim’s store management by force by force, such as having her sound returned the goods he / she purchased.

2. The crime on April 19, 2015;

A. On April 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) demanded that the victim E, a victim E, who had already purchased at the 1st floor F store in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; (b) however, the victim refused to do so, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s sales management work by force by avoiding disturbance between about 20 minutes of “Yeong-si” and obstructing the victim’s sales management work by force.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2. A. at the time and place specified in paragraph 2. (a), inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc., which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

다. 협박 피고인은 제2.의 가항 기재 일시ㆍ장소에서 위 피해자 E에게 “마피아를 불러 총으로 쏴 죽여 버리겠다. 파 묻어버리겠다.”라고 말하여 피해자를 협박하였다.

3. Around May 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) demanded that the victim G at the first floor of the department store in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Goyang-si refund the pre-existing credit card in cash from May 1, 2015; (b) on the ground that the victim refused to refund the pre-existing credit card to the victim; (c) however, the Defendant demanded that the victim refund the pre-existing credit card to cash.

arrow