The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one million won of a fine) against the Defendant in the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although the damaged goods caused by the instant crime are unrelated to the fact that the economic value of the damaged goods is not so large that they are favorable to the Defendant, the Defendant committed the instant crime repeatedly despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times due to the same kind of crimes under the same veterinary law, and in full view of all the sentencing conditions expressed in the instant pleadings, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.