logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.12.29 2015고단2465
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM5 car.

피고인은 2015. 7. 18. 14:30경 위 승용차를 운전하여 파주시 와동동에 있는 벧엘교회 앞 사거리 교차로에 이르러 가람마을 4단지 방면에서 벧엘교회 방면으로 비보호좌회전을 하게 되었다.

Since there was a non-protective left turn crossing with the signal apparatus, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely turn to the left according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused injury to the victim, who was driven by the victim D(17 years of age) who was on the road that is facing the left part of the Defendant’s passenger car by the negligence of making a left turn turn, even though the former signal was red, and was driven by the victim, who was driven by the victim D(17 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each internal investigation report (referring to the measurement of alcohol of persons involved in an accident, statements of witnesses, investigation into the scene of an accident, etc.);

1. A medical certificate (D);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of the CCTV CD reproduction;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order lies in the degree of injury suffered by the victim of the instant traffic accident, and the fact that the negligence of the defendant in the occurrence of the instant traffic accident is not less than that of the defendant, but not less than that of the victim in the occurrence of the instant traffic accident, the negligence of the victim in the occurrence of the instant traffic accident is not less than that of the victim, but it appears that the damage suffered by the victim who subscribed to the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance can be recovered by substitution

arrow