beta
Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 1,998,50 on April 26, 2018.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On April 9, 2018, at the time of the party's status and the accident at the time of the insured vehicle CD of the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff, the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff, at the time of the insured vehicle's accident, the insurance money paid in front of the F Child Care Center located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E at the time of the insured vehicle's status
B. In the situation of collision, the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s insured vehicle”) committed an accident where the front side of the F childcare center in the above temporary border is facing the front side of the Defendant’s insured vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) on the right side of the Plaintiff’s front side in the direction of the Plaintiff’s running.
(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case"). [Ground for recognition: Evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and evidence No. 1 to No. 2 of this case]
2. Determination
A. The plaintiff asserts that the accident of this case is caused by the total negligence of the defendant vehicle that failed to proceed after securing sufficient space with the plaintiff's vehicle while driving in the bend section of a narrow channel. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the total amount of the insurance money paid by the plaintiff.
B. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence revealed earlier, namely, ① the area where the instant accident occurred is the bend section, but the vehicle seems to have a narrow range to the degree to which the two costs of the instant accident occurred; ② the Plaintiff’s vehicle occurred in the course of temporarily stopping and departing from the road slowly after a temporary stop. At the time, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was in a narrow state between the right surface of the road in the area where the accident occurred, and it seems difficult to demand the driver in the direction of the Plaintiff’s proceeding to attach the vehicle to the right side of the road. ③ Meanwhile, the obstacles impeding the Defendant’s vehicle to maintain the distance with the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the front direction of the vehicle at the place where the accident occurred.