1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 20, 198, the deceased F was assessed against E forest land E 793 square meters (hereinafter “the instant forest”), and G completed registration of preservation of ownership of the instant forest in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Transfer, etc. of Real Estate Ownership (Act No. 3562) on June 20, 1985.

B. As to the portion of 387/793 out of the forest land of this case on August 2, 1994, Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer due to the sale conducted on August 20, 1985 with respect to the remaining 396/793 shares.

C. The plaintiff A is a parent of the net F, and is the six degree of relationship between the defendants and the six degree of relationship, and the plaintiff B is a woman of the net F.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including virtual number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiffs’ assertion and judgment were discovered that H had a title trust in order to read the instant forest owned by the networkF, and that H agreed on March 8, 2012 to transfer 1/3 shares of the instant forest among the instant forest to the Plaintiffs in the future. As such, the Defendants, a title trustee, are liable to implement each procedure for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the shares stated in the claims regarding the instant forest in question to the Plaintiffs.

However, only the evidence submitted by the Plaintiffs, H made title trust with the forest of this case to the Defendants.

In addition, around March 8, 2012, H or the Defendants are insufficient to recognize that they agreed to jointly own part of the forest land of this case to the Plaintiffs, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

3. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.