The purport of the claim alone cannot be deemed to have been wrong for the instant distribution schedule.

The plaintiff's assertion alone is without merit that the distribution schedule of this case should be prepared in the same manner as the purport of the claim.

Cheongju District Court Decision 2016Kadan93 Decided Demurrer against Distribution

00 Nonghyup

Overseas of the Republic of Korea

16.07.06

2016.21

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the Plaintiff

Cheong-gu Office

Of the dividend table prepared by the same court (hereinafter referred to as "instant dividend table") on December 30, 2015 with respect to the case of application for auction of real estate auction (hereinafter referred to as "auction case of this case"), the Cheongju District Court's Cheongju District Court's Cheongju District Court's 457, 2015, 1207, 1207, 207, 2015, the amount of dividends against the defendant is 25,554, and the amount of dividends against the defendant is 46,316,082 won of the amount of dividends against the plaintiff and 46,316,082 won of the amount of dividends against the plaintiff is changed to 5,312,620 won, each correction (the purport of the complaint is stated as '69,047,383 won after correction against the plaintiff, which is considered until the correction against other defendants already withdrawn, so it is understood as the plaintiff's remaining in the claim of this case of this case.

1. Grounds for claim;

이 사건 경매사건에 관한 매각대금 1,221,000,000원 중 토지 부분의 매각대금은 824,977,320원이고 건물 부분의 매각대금은 396,022,680원이다. 이 사건 경매사건에 관하여 토지 부분 매각대금의 잔여금 69,047,383원은 원고에게 배당되어야 한다. 건물 부분 매각대금 396,022,680원 중 집행비용, 00시 당해세, 근저당권자인 00기금,주식회사 00은행의 양수인 000유한회사에 대한 배당액을 제외한 나머지 31,555,215원 중 255,554원만이 피고에, 554,983원은 00공단에, 6,659,304원은 @@은행 주식회사에, 24,085,374원은 $$조합에 각 배당되어야 한다. 그럼에도 불구하고 이 사건 배당표는 별지 기재와 같이 피고에게 9,252,092원을 배당하는 것으로 작성되었으므로, 이 사건 배당표 중 피고에 대한 배당액 9,252,092원은 255,554원으로, 원고에 대한 배당액 46,316,082원은 55,312,620원[= 46,316,082원+ (9,252,092원 - 255,554원)]으로 변경하는 것으로 각 경정되어야 한다.

2. Determination

In this case, the distribution schedule of this case is revised as stated in the purport of the claim by only the plaintiff's above assertion.

It is insufficient to recognize that there is a need to do so, and there is no other evidence to recognize it.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.