1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim are dismissed, respectively.

2. Of the costs of lawsuit.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff filed a complaint to the Defendant with respect to the construction cost for electricity, fire-fighting, and telecommunications (hereinafter “instant construction”) among the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the total of 10 stories in building B (hereinafter “theme park construction”), C (hereinafter “C”) and the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the total of 10 stories in buildings, and for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the Defendant, the total of 290,202,80, and the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the construction cost for the Defendant to complete the construction cost for the remainder of 100,000,000 won for the construction cost for the construction cost for the first time and for the construction cost for the Defendant to complete the construction cost for the remainder of 50,000,000 won for damages.

나. 반소청구 피고는 원고로부터 테마파크 공사만을 공사대금 160,000,000원으로 정하여 하수급하였는데, 그 공사의 기성고가 90%에 이르고, 공사대금 합계 31,929,700원 상당의 추가공사(1차 접지설비 추가 설치공사 14,208,000원, 2차 간판ㆍ비상등ㆍ인터폴 추가 설치공사 14,819,000원)도 하였음에도 원고로부터 공사대금 중 33,539,551원을 지급받지 못 했고, C 공사는 하수급하지 않고 원고에게 인력지원과 일부 자재공급을 하고 그 비용을 정산받기로 하였는데 원고로부터 11,000,000원만 지급받아 71,701,427원을 지급받지 못 했다고 주장하면서, 피고의 원고에 대한 위 채권 중 50,000,000원 부분을 소외 주식회사 네라네트웍에게 양도하였으므로, 나머지 55,008,278원(= 33,539,551원 71,701,427원 - 50,000,000원)의 지급을 구한다.

2. Determination on the main claim

A. The Defendant’s test construction from the Plaintiff.